Noble suffering we can endure. Perhaps it is for a worthy
ideal that we suffer, perhaps at the hands of a brutish tyrant who would crush
our spirit and vanquish our will. In the face of such suffering, we stiffen our
resolve and harden our hearts and know that we will not be broken. We know that
the pains we suffer today will be rewarded tomorrow with glorious redemption.
Our suffering will be recognised as worthy and righteous. And knowing this, we
can endure it.
But most suffering is nothing like that. Most suffering is
appallingly mundane. Maliciously quotidian. Disastrously ordinary. Bills must
be paid. Rent found. Mortgages kept up. We make our weary way to work. We are
anonymous among the anonymous crowd. Our fellow-sufferers. We toil at our jobs,
unsure why. We make our way home, our minds numb, our souls worn.
None of this produces the obvious signs of suffering, of
servitude, of punishment. There are no marks of the lash across our backs, no
chains about our feet, nothing to suggest that here is noble suffering. There
is nothing noble in eternal tedium and the knowledge that tomorrow will be unrelentingly
like today. And this simply makes the suffering harder to endure. There is no
promise of redemption, no promise that one day someone will say, ‘See how he
suffered for his cause. See how he endured and how he fought for freedom or
justice or something decent on the TV’. There is, that is to say, no point to
our suffering, and it is this – this abject pointlessness
– which so strips it of anything noble. The worst malady a human can suffer is
an abiding sense of pointlessness. Without a reason why, the smallest pin-prick can become a torment worse than
anything imagined in Dante’s hell. But give us that reason, explain to us why, and then we can endure.
Those like Richard Dawkins or the late (and tediously
boorish) Christopher Hitchens who shriek hysterically about the evils of faith
are like an excitable teenager who has just discovered Nietzsche and goes
around daringly proclaiming to the world that God is dead. While it’s excusable
in a teenager, it becomes less so once a person is of more advanced years, say
twenty. From the comfortable and lofty heights which zealots such as Dawkins proclaim
their message, it is easy to be unbowed by the meaninglessness of it all, but
if your life is not quite so privileged, or yours is a disposition – unelected
– which simply can find no comfort in science and reason, then faith may be all
you have to make this life bearable. And so be it.
A very compassionate view!
ReplyDelete